SL scrape to one-wicket win after Narine's three

ESPNcricinfo staff01-Nov-2015Once play began, Suranga Lakmal had the measure of West Indies’ top order and a disciplined spell from him reduced them to 24 for 3•Associated PressThe clouds arrived again, during the 15th over of West Indies’ innings, and this time, the delay stretched to well over three hours. On resumption, the match was reduced to 26 overs a side•AFPAfter the break, Andre Russell stepped up and whacked 41 off 24 balls, with three sixes and as many fours.•Associated PressHe had good support from Darren Bravo, who shared in a 58-run, fifth-wicket stand•Associated PressThe most manic charge came from Jason Holder who slammed 36 off 13 deliveries to lift West Indies to 159 for 8•AFPWith Sri Lanka needing 163 to win, Tillakaratne Dilshan got them off to a bright start, making use of West Indies’ short lengths•AFPDilshan raced to a fifty off 25 deliveries – his fastest in ODIs – and put Sri Lanka in a comfortable position, but his wicket triggered a slide•Associated PressAfter Angelo Mathews’ dismissal in the 16th over, Sri Lanka’s chase was almost thrown off track by Sunil Narine’s triple-wicket over•AFPJonathan Carter then took two wickets off two balls in the 24th over to leave Sri Lanka 11 runs short of the target with only one wicket in hand•AFPAjantha Mendis, however, inched the score forward and capitalised on a free hit from Johnson Charles to help Sri Lanka scrape home to a one-wicket win•Associated Press

Late NOCs, and a stressed-out captain

Sylhet Super Stars’ campaign began in farcical circumstances, included three narrow defeats, and ended with even their captain bogged down by pressure

Mohammad Isam11-Dec-2015

Tournament overview

Sylhet Super Stars had some hope of making it to the last four even on the last day of the league phase, but as their 71-run defeat to Comilla Victorians showed, they were not really up to it this season. They won three of their 10 matches, giving them a fifth-place finish, just above Chittagong Vikings.Sylhet could consider themselves unlucky too after losing their first three games to Chittagong, Barisal and Rangpur, by the closest of margins – one run, one run and six runs. But their troubles had already begun before their first match, when due to a bungle up between them and the BCB, they did not have the necessary signatures to field Ravi Bopara and Josh Cobb. When the pair finally got their NOCs, it came through a few minutes after the toss, but they were still sent to play despite not having their names in the team sheet.The match was delayed by an hour and during the discussion out in the open, Tamim Iqbal and one of the Sylhet owners got into a slanging match. Sylhet ultimately lost that game and the next three before they finally won for the first time in Chittagong, against Comilla by 34 runs. Upon returning to Dhaka, they crushed Barisal Bulls in a nine-wicket win before Junaid Siddique, Bopara and Shahid Afridi inspired them to the third win, against Dhaka.Mushfiqur Rahim left the captaincy just before their second win, with coach Sarwar Imran saying that the Bangladesh Test captain could handle the pressure of losing close games, coupled with his wicketkeeping and batting duties. Indeed Mushfiqur’s batting suffered, but barring Mohammad Shahid ,none of the other locals really stood out either with their performances. Sylhet would also feel that their foreign recruits, particularly Bopara with the bat, could have given them a lot more.

High point

With Sylhet facing certain elimination, Junaid Siddique and Ravi Bopara steered a tricky chase against Dhaka Dynamites in their penultimate match. When they had exited after making fifties, Afridi swept Farhad Reza for consecutive sixes in the final over to seal the win. Their celebration looked more like relief but they needed that win to stay relevant till the last day of the league phase.

Low point

Their worst moment was when Mushfiqur walked into the Mirpur field with Bopara and Cobb behind him, despite not having their names in the team sheet at the toss about 30 minutes earlier. The situation went into a tail-spin with Chittagong refusing to take the field until the matter was resolved. Ultimately the BCB had to ask Sylhet to play without the English pair, and they went on to lose the game by one run.

Top of the class

Bopara did not start well with the bat but he was effective with his military medium-pace, with much variation. In Sylhet’s first win in the tournament after four losses, Bopara took four wickets and scored 50 while his second half-century also came in a Sylhet win. He finished with 10 wickets, but must have wanted to score more than the 132 runs he managed.

Under-par performer

Mushfiqur was the highest scorer in the last BPL, in 2013, when he inspired Sylhet Royals to the last four. This time however, he was weighed down by the captaincy so much that he left the role towards the end citing extreme pressure. Afridi took over as captain, while Mushfiqur ended up with just 157 runs in the 10 matches.

Tip for 2016

The team owners, Alif Group, would have to approach the player selection differently in the BPL’s next edition. They missed out on Brad Hodge but the likes of Bopara, Cobb and Ajantha Mendis did not perform according to expectations. Their local players, except Shahid perhaps, left a lot to be desired.

Big names impress in third week of tournament

ESPNcricinfo’s wrap of the third week of the Women’s Big Bash League

GEOFF LEMON AND ADAM COLLINS24-Dec-2015Everyone is back in town3:49

‘Three teams break losing streak’

Halfway through the third weekend of the Women’s Big Bash League, three teams remained winless. On Sunday all of them broke through. With 14 games to play for each team, there is still time for a winning streak to carry any side into the final.The Adelaide Strikers did it in the most explosive style. The Sydney Thunder would have thought they were cruising after Naomi Stalenberg’s early onslaught of 39 from 19 balls, as the Strikers tried eight bowlers to no avail.But, facing an imposing 149 to win, the Strikers’ English star Sarah Taylor opened the innings with an unbeaten 71 from 47 balls, running down the highest successful WBBL chase with an over to spare.For the Melbourne Renegades it was all about strangulation, as imported all-rounders Danielle Wyatt and Dane van Niekerk took 4 for 13 and 4 for 20 from their respective spells to hold a strong Brisbane Heat side to 110.Beth Mooney raised her fourth half-century of the tournament to stay top of the runs list, but aside from Lauren Winfield’s 26, the rest of the Heat’s batting card resembled a phone number. There were no problems in the chase, with van Niekerk (26) and Wyatt (28*) doing the business in both disciplines.The Sydney Sixers have looked a shambles so far with marquee player Ellyse Perry down on form and no one backing her up. However, South African international Marizanne Kapp came to the fore against the Perth Scorchers at the SCG with a suffocating opening spell.Marizanne Kapp’s early strikes gave Sydney Sixers momentum against Perth Scorchers•Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesHer five dot balls at the start of the match provoked Elyse Villani into skying an ugly slog to the wicketkeeper. Kapp then dried up the runs for Nicole Bolton until the Scorchers skipper missed a big shot and was bowled for 2 from 10 balls. In between, Perry had bowled England captain Charlotte Edwards off her pads, leaving the Scorchers at 3 for 14. Kapp had returns of 2 for 4 in three overs and would finish her day with 3 for 9.The Scorchers recovered thanks to a brilliant 51 from New Zealand international Suzie Bates, an innings that was ended by an equally brilliant run-out from her compatriot Sarah McGlashan.Even a chase of 108 looked steep for the Sixers’ fragile batting, but Perry followed up her 2 for 20 by batting through the innings for 32 not out, providing the cohesion. Kapp, meanwhile, brought momentum with her 17 from 19 balls, falling to a poor lbw decision from umpire Claire Polosack to a ball that was pitching and hitting well outside off stump. Luckily the decision could not prevent the end of a seven-game losing streak for the team in pink.And at the other end of the table, for consistency’s sake, the previously unbeaten Hobart Hurricanes had their first defeat on Saturday, when the Scorchers kept them to 109 for 8, and chased the score down with four wickets to spare.A round for the big names from abroadThe WBBL’s drawcard is that it assembles cricketing talent, not just frothe domestic pool but internationally. In its first season, the tournament has immediately become a carnival of the best players on the planet.Sarah Taylor, who has previously been named both ODI and T20 Player of the Year, falls into that elite category. As do van Niekerk and Wyatt, who play for South Africa and England respectively.The other S Taylor – the West Indies Women’s captain, Stafanie – has been consistent throughout. Her returns of 59*, 30, 35, 11 and 43 are not eye-catching on paper, but have been so on the field, given their stylish manufacture. They leave her sixth on the run-scoring charts after only five innings, and have helped the Thunder make the top four after playing only five games.The Hurricanes captain and principal import, England vice-captain Heather Knight, continues to do no wrong. Before the Scorchers finally ended Knight’s winning streak, her 74 was the defining innings in the side’s previous one-run win against Scorchers. Knight’s self-styled Lilac Ladies have firmed their position as the close-finish specialists.Encouraging, too, for the Hurricanes was Hayley Matthews’ breakout performance. After a run of single digit scores, the huge-hitting, 17-year-old from Barbados was moved up to open with Knight, and plundered 77 in 51 balls to end what had been an unbeaten run for the Melbourne Stars. Winning streaks or not, the Hurricanes remain on top of the ladder.Hurricanes captain Heather Knight’s form has played a big role in the side’s climb to the top•Cricket Australia/Getty Images…and the big names at homeFor the Heat, Jess Jonassen compiled what was described as the perfect T20 game – 3 for 11 opening the bowling with her left-arm spin, then an unbeaten 67 to chase the Strikers’ 125 for 9.Their surge after three opening losses has been underpinned by 21-year-old opening batsman and wicketkeeper Mooney. With incumbent national stumper Alyssa Healy in indifferent batting form, Mooney seems to be making a case for a national call up.Not far behind her on the runs tally, from half the number of innings, is the Australian captain. Meg Lanning did what Meg Lanning does: a half-century to knock off the Sixers in their first leg, and 37 unbeaten to see off a chase in the second.Lanning’s team-mate in the baggy green and the Stars cap, Kristen Beams, collected seven more frugal wickets over the weekend to assert why she is the most potent spinner in the land. Delissa Kimmince, meanwhile, is the unlikely wicket-taking leader at this stage of the competition.Everything else was big, so the audiences were tooWho would have thought: if you screen it, they will watch. Watch they did. Channel Ten and Cricket Australia are to be applauded for televising selected WBBL fixtures this season, and they have been immediately rewarded.A quarter of a million people watched the Heat beat the Sixers on Saturday, and nearly 200,000 more when the Sixers surprised the Scorchers early on Sunday. As one major newspaper noted, that’s three times the number who watched the domestic A-League football.So successful was the debut that Ten have immediately announced they will shift the Melbourne derby on January 2 onto their main channel, having originally planned to screen it on secondary digital channel One. Such an early experiment to further test local appetite is an excellent sign for the game. Five others are due to be televised: December 31, January 1, January 9, January 16, and the final on January 24.Between Boxing Day and New Year’s Eve we have a four-game carnival at the WACA in Perth, where the Scorchers will host the Stars and t Thunder. In the context of the season, with all three sides travelling well, these are vital fixtures in determining the final four.

Hunger for big runs drives understated Anmolpreet

A calm approach and an appetite for accumulating runs held Anmolpreet Singh in good stead in the World Cup semi-final against Sri Lanka Under-19s

Vishal Dikshit in Mirpur09-Feb-2016Anmolpreet Singh’s batting position in the India Under-19s team is No. 3, squeezed in between three established names – Rishabh Pant, Ishan Kishan and Sarfaraz Khan. Anmolpreet can easily go unnoticed whether it’s because of his batting style or unfamiliarity with the fans. He didn’t play any of India’s league matches that were on TV, he has not played Ranji Trophy and his name was not in the recent IPL auction.In spite of all that Anmolpreet has stamped his name on the No. 3 spot by leading India to the World Cup final with a solid 72 that helped them put on a challenging score of 267 against Sri Lanka in the semi-final. He came out to bat with the score at 23 for 1 when the Sri Lanka Under-19s pacers were nipping the ball around on an overcast morning. The score soon became 27 for 2 and India’s top order was left shaken again.Anmolpreet had a more experienced Sarfaraz at the other end but his own inexperience hardly showed. He displayed impressive technique with plenty of classical straight-bat shots and gauged the situation like a player who had already played on the Mirpur pitch.”The wicket was tough and the ball was doing a bit. So my discussion with Sarfaraz was to rotate the strike,” Anmolpreet said after the match. ” [We wanted to bat long] and then we could hit boundaries.”Anmolpreet’s first chance in the World Cup came in the quarter-final, against Namibia, in which he scored a quick 41 and took three late wickets. Before that, he scored a heap of runs in matches that were not shown on television.He was recently named the Under-19 Cricketer of the Year by the BCCI for his prolific run in the 2014-15 Cooch Behar Trophy. He topped the run-scoring charts with 1154 runs in 10 innings at an average of 144.25 with the help of five hundreds and two fifties; no other batsman in the tournamnt scored more than 850. One of the centuries was a mammoth effort of 322 against Jammu & Kashmir.Anmolpreet’s nature of accumulating runs is not recent. In the 2013-14 season, he had helped Punjab Under-19s lift the Vinoo Mankad Trophy with a measured knock of 79 in the final against Bengal and finished the tournament with 300 runs at an average of 50 with three fifties to his name. In the Cooch Behar Trophy that season, he finished with an average of 107.80 by amassing 539 runs from five innings with two hundreds and as many fifties.His hunger to score big emerged during his early years in Patiala and a childhood spent following his cousins to cricket grounds to watch inter-college matches. Sports was running in the family a generation before: his father was the captain of the India handball team and represented the country from 1982 to 2000. When Anmolpreet’s talent came to the fore, he joined the DMW Academy and the Black Elephant Club in Patiala to hone his skills.”My father would guide me on how to go about things, but I have been coached by different coaches at different academies,” Anmolpreet told the BCCI website last month. “I started getting more matches from the Army Ground [in Patiala] and then I got a coach who also guided me. He taught me the basics. From there I shifted to the Dhruv Pandove Stadium where I still train.”He went on to represent Punjab Under-16s and Under-19s and made his Twenty20 debut for Punjab in the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy last year. He got a chance to bat only once in two T20s but his outings at the Under-19 level had impressed the selectors enough to try him out in two tri-series before the World Cup. On his Youth ODI debut, he scored 28, followed it with a fifty and averaged 27.25 with the bat before the World Cup started. It wasn’t enough to throw an established player off his perch in the XI that was taking shape.He didn’t get to bat in the warm-ups even as other batsmen registered fifties and hundreds. That was, however, followed by a poor stretch of runs from Ricky Bhui, India’s first-choice No. 3 who had also played the last World Cup in 2014. The Indian team management gambled by dropping an experienced player for a youngster for the knockouts and it paid off.”You can trust in each of the 15 players we have,” Kishan said about Anmolpreet’s inclusion. “We know they can perform when the team needs. We have seen Anmol’s batting and he performs in matches even if the situation is bad. He also bowls. We always think about the team, and he has proved himself.”Anmolpreet didn’t look perturbed at all that he had not been given a chance before the quarter-final. “When Ricky did not score, sir (Rahul Dravid) gave me a chance and I did well.”His offspin bowling option does provide India another spinner on the slow tracks in Bangladesh, even though their pacers and frontline spinners have not had to depend on part-timers so far. Whether you ask him about his batting approach today, or in the triple-hundred against J&K, or while batting in general, he says: . He will now hope he can do the same in the final, if the opportunity arises, and with his cricketing career.

Shakib's costly drop, Pandya's drop-kicked caress

Plays of the day from the Asia Cup opener between Bangladesh and India in Mirpur

Mohammad Isam in Mirpur24-Feb-2016The costly dropAfter having survived the new ball on a green pitch, Rohit Sharma threw his hands at a wide Taskin Ahmed delivery. The opener timed it well but hit it straight to point where Shakib Al Hasan had the ball in his grasp for a second before it burst out. Rohit, who was on 21 when he was reprieved, struck two fours and a six off the next three balls; all went past Shakib. Rohit would later bring up his fifty off Shakib.The tag-team effortJasprit Bumrah got rid of Soumya Sarkar for 11, but it was Ashish Nehra who deserved the wicket more. Nehra toyed with Soumya in the first over, where he failed to put bat on ball. Bumrah built on Nehra’s work and beat Soumya a couple of times outside off before having him edging behind in the fourth over.The ominous coincidenceJust like Rohit Sharma had hit a six a ball after he was dropped in the 11th over, Sabbir Rahman offered a half-chance in the 11th over of the chase and hit a six a ball later. Sabbir struck it sweetly over midwicket but unlike Rohit he tried too much and looked to force boundaries as Bangladesh fell away.The drop-kicked caressThe Bangladesh bowlers couldn’t get Hardik Pandya with good-length deliveries and shorter deliveries and therefore Mashrafe Mortaza attempted a full ball. It, however, came out as a full toss, which was caressed through the outfield with superb wristwork. The shot was the definition of a drop kick through midwicket.The miscuesVirat Kohli, who had talked up Mustafizur Rahman’s growing prowess on the eve of the Asia Cup opener, kept playing and missing deliveries from the left-arm fast bowler in the fourth over, having failed to blast him through the covers or over his head. Kohli’s more familiar timing deserted him in the next over too as he lobbed a catch to Mahmudllah mid-off.

When Mohit got his bluff wrong

Mohit’s poor execution may have cost Kings XI the game, but to say that he did so without any reason wouldn’t be giving him credit for his otherwise pin-point execution all season

Sidharth Monga in Mohali15-May-2016Bluff. Not to be confused with double bluff, which, sometimes, excitable and excited commentators use synonymously. Shane Watson recently used the word bluff in a flash interview. In a joint interview alongside James Faulkner, Dwayne Bravo told the IPL website earlier this season, “Nowadays, batsmen have an idea as to where the bowler will bowl. So a bluff is very important to catch a batsman off guard. Like Jimmy (Faulkner) said earlier, you might look a bit like an idiot when the bluff does not work in your favour.”Watson’s point was you cannot afford to telegraph to the batsman with your field what exactly you are going to bowl and then go ahead and bowl that ball every time.Mohit Sharma can count himself as one of those best finishing bowlers this IPL. He has been using the slower balls to good effect, especially with a yorker added to his arsenal. The game on Sunday was especially made for slower balls. As Kings XI Punjab began to pull Sunrisers Hyderabad back in defense of 179, they kept bowling cutters into the pitch. Starting with the 10th over, the only boundaries hit until the end of the 14th – three of them – came off deliveries bowled at regulation pace. Mind you, even a set David Warner couldn’t hit a single slower ball to the fence, and these overs were predominantly filled with slower deliveries.The asking rate finally crossed 10 at the end of the 14th over. It was clear that slower balls was the way to go now because they were gripping the surface and were impossible to time if the batsmen made any premature movement. In the 15th over, though, Deepak Hooda began to improvise. He shuffled across the stumps, and waited and waited for a slower bouncer from Marcus Stoinis before pulling it over short fine leg, almost like waiting at the net in volleyball before smashing a lob from your team-mate. In the next over, Yuvraj Singh showed he was prepared for the slower balls when he lofted Sandeep Sharma for a huge six over midwicket.Thanks to those two hits, Sunrisers kept with the asking rate of 10 an over for two overs, but Axar Patel bowled a superb 17th over, including three balls at the new batsman Ben Cutting to take it up to 39 off the last three overs.Now Kings XI went to perhaps their best bowler of the tournament, Mohit. Thanks to that Axar over, Mohit had again found some breathing space to bowl those slower balls. The field – both third man and fine leg inside the circle – suggested so. We were now expecting the slower ball too, but that is what messes with the bowler’s mind. How many slower balls before the batsman starts to expect them and is waiting for them? There were already signs that the batsmen had started to find their way around the slower ones. Also the shorter boundary was leg side for Yuvraj, the man on strike at the start of the 18th over. You still have to show him the field for the slower ball, though.Now Mohit’s trademark slower, the back-of-the-hand legcutter, which is usually effective and is his trusted delivery, can be well under 110kmph. This time Mohit tried the other one: the offcutter, at 128kph, barely a drop from his peak pace of mid-130s. Yuvraj wasn’t taken by surprise, the bluff had been called, and a big six was hit. The next ball was at 136kph, just outside off, and Yuvraj steered it in the gap between point and short third man. Now with the pressure gone, Cutting picked the 106kph slower ball later in the over, waited for it, and slugged it between long-on and deep midwicket for four.The game was over with Mohit not bowling to his field, but to say that he did so without any reason would be to not give him enough credit after he has been doing the job for Kings XI all season long. This was in all likelihood a bluff gone wrong. Perhaps he should have bowled another slower ball before the bluff. Perhaps he should have bluffed with a yorker.Death bowling is not a science, there are nights when it leaves you with just perhapses, especially with the heavy bats. Sunday night was one such for Mohit.

Zaheer's magic ball and Kohli's super sprint

Plays of the day from the match between Delhi Daredevils and Royal Challengers Bangalore in Raipur

Alagappan Muthu22-May-2016The super sprint
It looked perfect. Big bat, broad straight face, the sponsor’s name catching the floodlights and the ball headed for the sightscreen. Karun Nair had held his pose after lofting legspinner Yuzvendra Chahal in the sixth over and must have been expecting a boundary. But Raipur is a big ground – it’s 78m down the ground – so he was pushed into running. “At worst, I’d have to settle for a two,” Karun may have thought.Virat Kohli saw it all differently. He was on the edge of the 30-yard circle at mid-off and the ball had travelled quite a distance past him when he began running. But he knew the batsman’s timing was not good enough. Looking over his left shoulder, and trusting his legs to mark their own course, Kohli drew level with the ball a couple of metres inside the boundary and completed an incredible running catch. The crowd was going gaga over the effort, but the Royal Challengers Bangalore captain told them to shush with a finger on his lips.The bowler finally benefits
That was Chahal’s first strike of the day. One more in the 10th over had him tied with Bhuvneshwar Kumar’s tally of 18 for the No. 1 spot in this season’s bowling charts. With Delhi Daredevils unable to cope with the bounce in the pitch and the size of the ground, Chahal was given the 17th over to finish his spell. The first ball kicked up on Quinton de Kock and his swat through the covers became a top edge that landed in Chris Jordan’s hands at long-off.However, before the batsman could walk off the field, the umpires wanted to double-check if it had been a legal delivery. Replays seemed to indicate that Chahal’s heel, although raised, was not behind the line. The third umpire Virender Sharma took a lot of time to make his call, and that is often a sign of doubt. Sanjay Manjrekar in the commentary box mentioned the benefit of that doubt, in these cases, went to the bowler. And so it did. By the end of the night, Royal Challengers had the top run-getter and the top-wicket taker and two shots at the trophy.The magic ball
A required rate of 6.95 to the Royal Challengers batting line-up is like playing a game with the difficulty set at its lowest. Take out Chris Gayle early and it becomes moderately more challenging. Daredevils managed that in the second over. Still, they had to take AB de Villiers out to be in with a shout. So Zaheer Khan ran in with a slip in place and a packed off side ring.Raipur was supposed to be Daredevils’ home venue but it had offered very little help to them – the fans were seduced by Kohli and Royal Challengers and the pitch had contributed to their dismal total of 138. But in the third over, Zaheer’s back-of-a-length delivery hit the deck and ballooned up at the batsman. De Villiers, who was caught off guard, popped a catch to Jayant Yadav at cover point and fell for 6.The withdrawn appeal
It isn’t often that Amit Mishra goes wicketless in the IPL. He is, after all, the most successful spinner in the tournament’s history. And on Sunday, he could have got Shane Watson out twice in two balls. Bowling his third over of the match, he got a googly to rip into the right-hander, who had misread the ball and shaped to cut. The turn was sharp and the ball crashed into Watson’s back pad before it made contact with the bat. The impact was low enough and it was certainly in line with the stumps, but Mishra and the wicketkeeper de Kock thought it was bat first and weren’t keen with their appeal. Watson bashed the next ball for six, although only after Yadav on the long-on boundary had attempted to catch it but instead parried it over the ropes.

Pradeep shines amid Sri Lankan gloom

There was little for the tourists to smile about during three cold, wet and trying Tests

Andrew Fidel Fernando14-Jun-20167Nuwan Pradeep (10 wickets at 31.60)Occasionally expensive, but often the most incisive in the attack, Pradeep moved the ball either way off the seam, prompting shots as bad as his haircut and sparking hope as thin as his limbs. In Sri Lanka’s final bowling innings of the series at Lord’s he left three sets of stumps splayed – this time, it wasn’t because he had fallen into them. Team-mates dropped several catches off him and their was also Rod Tucker’s erroneous no-ball. “If anyone deserved five wickets at Lord’s it was Pradeep,” was coach Graham Ford’s assessment.Rangana Herath (seven wickets at 43.28, 109 runs at 21.80)In the first two Tests, Sri Lanka batted too poorly to bring Herath properly into the match. But though he didn’t pick up as many wickets as he would have liked on his final tour of England, he did make plenty of new fans. Some of his best moments came with bat in hand, when he suggested to team-mates conditions were not quite as difficult as they had made them seem. At Lord’s, when Steven Finn sledged him, Herath gave him the long, irate glare of a father who had come home to find his son drinking with his friends on the verandah.6Dushmantha Chameera (three wickets at 21.33)Was a little low on his usual pace in his only match of the series, but did help clear out the tail at Headingley. How Sri Lanka missed that knack at Chester-le-Street and Lord’s. Went home with a stress-related back injury immediately after the first Test. So much of Sri Lanka’s Test bowling hopes seem to rely on his staying clear of harm in the future that SLC should build him a house full of padded rooms, and have him transported from place to place in bubble wrap.Kusal Perera (42 runs at 42.00)Came back from a ban and immediately suggested the No. 7 position in the Test side should be his, allowing him to provide impetus from lower down the order. He has shown substantial mental strength over the past few months – not least in stepping back into his whites despite only recently returning to training, and having suffered visa delays after being picked.Dinesh Chandimal (172 runs at 34.40)Provided Sri Lanka’s innings of the series in the second dig at Chester-le-Street, from the No.6 position that seems more suited to him than the No. 4 spot he began the tour in. He is less animated behind the stumps than he once was, but also seemed to think someone had put a landmine down just to the right of his keeping position, because he didn’t even attempt to pouch two chances that flew past his right glove.Dinesh Chandimal’s hundred at Chester-le-Street was the innings of the series for Sri Lanka•AFP5Shaminda Eranga (five wickets at 64.80)Moved the ball away from batsmen at a lively pace, but was often also guilty of relieving pressure with loose overs. He didn’t bowl as badly as the figures suggested, partly because so many chances off the edge went through unnecessarily, bafflingly, infuriatingly vacant slips. His career is now at something of a crossroads, with the results from his biomechanical test due in the next few days. Still, even with a suspect action, he managed not to stir the local media into a frenzy when he played at Lord’s, and that, in a way, is an achievement.Kusal Mendis (156 runs at 31.20)Coaches are raving about his technique. Fans are excited by his strokeplay. The man himself seems focused and unaffected by it all. He provided the only batting resistance Sri Lanka could manage at Headingley, and made a few bright starts thereafter. It seems as if almost everyone in the squad can’t resist ruffling his hair.Suranga Lakmal (five wickets at 51.80)The least menacing of the seamers who played in this series but usually a reliable support bowler when someone was testing batsmen at the other end. His best bowling was early in the first innings at Lord’s, when he had Nick Compton edging behind and Joe Root trapped in front of the stumps. Though the gangliest of the attack, he also took some of the most athletic catches on the boundary.Dasun Shanaka (three wickets at 15.33, four runs at 2.00)Sri Lanka haven’t really known what to make of Shanaka, because at times it seems he hasn’t really known what to make of himself. He forced himself into the Headingley XI with a swashbuckling hundred in a warm-up match, invited batsmen to drive on the first day with his drifting flower petal seam-up deliveries, then failed twice with the bat – though he did get some nigh-unplayable balls. He is a walking national stereotype where wide, warm smiles are concerned. Expect to see more of his endearingly exposed teeth in the limited-overs series.Kaushal Silva (193 runs at 32.16)Had one of the toughest jobs in the series – in facing the England attack at their freshest, with a hard Dukes ball in hand – and came out of that challenge with moderate credit. His half-century at Chester-le-Street laid the base for a confidence-building recovery, and his positivity at Lord’s was refreshing from a player who has generally scored slowly. By the end of the tour, even his defensive shots had character; he left the ball like it had been unfaithful to him, although his final act was an ill-advised shouldering of arms.4Milinda Siriwardana (three wickets at 24.00, 35 runs at 17.50)Why he only played one match after such a promising start to his Test career, only the selectors will know. He spun the ball hard at Chester-le-Street, but will admit that his batting has some way to go in swinging conditions. Of all the pretty but inconsequential drives Sri Lanka played this series, Siriwardana might have played the prettiest one, on the third day of the second Test.3Dimuth Karunaratne (129 runs at 25.80)Having made such progress in his batting over the past 18 months, and having also had moderately successful tours of New Zealand, more was expected from Karunaratne. He was perhaps guilty of being too tentative early in the tour, which is the opposite problem from the one he had in 2014. Scores of 50 and 37 not out at Lord’s salvaged his series somewhat.Angelo Mathews was not the batting bulwark his team have come to rely on•PA PhotosAngelo Mathews (125 runs at 25.00, one wicket at 98.00)Delivered some fine supporting spells without breaking through, but for once he was an enthusiastic member in the collapse , instead of Sri Lanka’s batting bulwark. He was excellent at first slip to the spinners again. His captaincy, though, was flabby for most of the series. At Chester-le-Street on day two, anyone else in the team, or members of the public, or even the cardboard cutouts of him at the ground, might have led more proactively than the flesh-and-blood Mathews.2Lahiru Thirimanne (87 runs at 17.40)After 50 Test innings, Thirimanne averages 24.00. At times in this tour, he seemed to have excellent defensive technique. He batted 262 balls. Joe Root, in comparison, faced only 140. He was perhaps trying to make the ball old so the strokemakers around him could prosper but, with a high score of 22, it was Sri Lanka fans he was really successful at aging.

Come on folks, you need to be realistic

The third day began with much hope for Sri Lanka but it ended with talk of progress being restricted to small moments

Andrew Fidel Fernando at Lord's11-Jun-20164:21

Jayawardene: Sri Lanka are trying to make it harder for themselves

If you are a Sri Lanka fan, you might have woken up this morning with high hopes. Your team’s openers had made a triple-figure stand. One of the openers had a Lord’s century in his sights. Could Sri Lanka bat long enough to bring Rangana Herath’s spin into the game, you might have wondered. Might batsmen leave the field with a strut of a peacock this time, instead of eyes of a puppy dog?Having probably sobbed yourself to sleep in the foetal position after the second day of each of the previous Tests, it is understandable if you became a little excited by an overnight scoreline of 162 for 1. But, listen, you must be realistic. This is a Sri Lanka team in the throes of consecutive periods of transition. They have administrators who travel en masse to Lord’s and spend millions on shows and tournament songs, instead of paying domestic cricketers a living wage. So it’s silly not to expect frequent collapses, don’t you think? It’s vital not to have pie-in-the-sky dreams like a first-innings deficit of only two figures.It has often been said this series that Sri Lanka have not played the swinging or seaming ball particularly well. Well, that’s probably fair. In Hamilton last December, it was said that Sri Lanka didn’t play the short ball particularly well. Also, in the middle of 2015, they did not cover themselves in glory against legspin (Yasir Shah) or offspin (R Ashwin). And, okay, when the ball was not doing much in the morning session here, they appeared to have substantial issues against non-swinging, non-seaming, non-turning deliveries as well. Five top-order wickets fell for 43 runs.But think about all the balls Sri Lanka didn’t get out to. There appear to be no major weakness to short, wide balls, for example. Long hops have been almost laughably ineffective against them. If England had bowled loopy, knee-high full tosses, all day long, well, those, I’m sure, would have been sublimely defended back down the pitch. It’s not all bad.Having tottered to low first-innings Headingley and Chester-le-Street, it must also be mentioned that at Lord’s, there was significant run-scoring to bookend the mass self-immolation in the morning session. Kaushal Silva and Dimuth Karunaratne had half-centuries. Kusal Perera and Herath – who has outscored two top-order team-mates this series – put on a heartening 71 together.At Lord’s Sri Lanka scored more than England’s highest first-innings scorer, for once. They didn’t fall over in the street and drown in a puddle like total idiots. They walked all the way up to the top of the bridge and only then, plunged off it. Returning this team to competitiveness is a long process, by many accounts. Here was progress of the strictly slow-and-drawn-out variety.And fine, it wasn’t 450-wicket swear word maestro James Anderson taking the wickets this time. It was a cherub-faced Chris Woakes and topple-heavy Steven Finn bowling themselves into form. But it’s not always the highly-rated spearheads that get wickets you know. Supporting bowlers can be quite skilled too. Just look through the list of bowlers who have delivered incisive spells at Sri Lanka recently. Neil Wagner is not that bad a bowler. Amit Mishra can be a handful. Stuart Binny as well. And so, okay, Kraigg Brathwaite only had three first-class wickets before he took 6 for 29 at the P Sara in October, but he’s underrated, surely? Either that or it was a very dusty pitch.In the field, Sri Lanka missed three clear catches in the evening. Wicketkeeper Dinesh Chandimal didn’t even attempt to pouch the easiest of the lot. Perhaps there is no real improvement in that department per se, but maybe Sri Lanka are learning to devise strategies that account for the drops. Like the Pakistan quicks of yore, Nuwan Pradeep went at the stumps to get his wickets. When he was on a hat-trick in dim light, and in the middle of one of the spells of his life, his captain didn’t bother to give him a third slip. Angelo Mathews is often accused of being over-conservative, but you can see his reasoning here, can’t you? There is no point to non-catching catching men.Sri Lanka were still hanging in the match by a thread as the third day wound to a close. This was thanks largely to the efforts of their depleted attack. At Headingley they had already been pummeled by this stage. At Chester-le-Street they were fighting to make England bat again. Yes, sure, their 288 all out is by a distance the lowest completed first-class total at Lord’s this year, but in there were several patches of competence, am I right?Please…. am I right?

Sohail Khan ends his exile in triumph

After five years in the wilderness, Sohail Khan seized his chance for a Test comeback and bowled Pakistan into the ascendancy at Edgbaston

Jarrod Kimber at Edgbaston03-Aug-2016In 2007-08, a young Pakistani paceman took 91 wickets in the season at 18. It was a record for Pakistani first-class record. And, in that same year, he took a 16-wicket haul in one match.Today he played his third Test.In 2008-09, a young Pakistani paceman took 56 wickets at 15. By the end of 2009 he had played six Tests.Sohail Khan was the man who took the 91 wickets – in two further seasons he had taken over 60. The 56-wicket man? Mohammad Amir. The chosen one. The prodigy.Khan played two Tests – the first of which, against Sri Lanka at Karachi in February 2009, was the last completed Test to have been played in Pakistan. He took 0 for 164 in the match, at more than six an over, on one of the flattest pitches ever produced. His next Test was against Zimbabwe at Bulawayo, in which Tatenda Taibu became his first and, for several years, only Test wicket, at a further cost of 81 runs.That was in September 2011. He has had to wait five years for another chance. The same amount of time for which Amir has been suspended.***The Hindu Kush mountains, among Pakistan’s most rugged locations, has started to produce more and more cricketers over the last few years. It is a world away from Lahore and Karachi, in weather and in life. And the players who come from there are often noticeably different.It isn’t often that a bowler talks about a training program that includes swimming across rivers, rolling rocks down mountains and chopping wood, but that was a big part of Sohail’s life as a young man. He wasn’t a gym-born cricketer, he was a mountain man. Later, he attended Rashid Latif’s academy where he was trained in modern cricket coaching methods. There, his weightlifter’s wing muscles were brought back under control, and became a young bowler of note.”Sometimes I bowl so fast that the ball sends the stumps flying before the batsman has even had a chance to bring his bat down,” he once told PakPassion. And he was a regular in fast-bowling competitions. But despite the training, the pace, and that massive pair of woodchopping shoulders, he had to wait until he was 23 to make his first-class debut.When he did, he enjoyed it. “I took three wickets in three overs,” he said. “I was bowling really fast and firing in bouncers, when one of my bouncers hit a guy on his helmet. The guy collapsed and passed out. After that I left the field and refused to continue bowling in case I hurt these guys.”He was a tearaway, a bouncer or yorker bowler, bowling with a Shoaib Ahktar run-up and a Waqar Younis mentality. He was raw and fast, but he wasn’t as rare, fast or special as Mohammad Amir.***Sohail Khan picks up his fifth wicket as James Anderson unsuccessfully reviews his lbw•AFPFind a good length, keep the seam in the right position, swing the ball, and ensure that there aren’t many chances to score. Sohail wasn’t reinventing modern bowling when he took the new ball for his Test comeback at Edgbaston.He wasn’t bowling lightning bolts or unplayable jaffas, he hit the right areas, he hit them a lot, he did it with a technically sound action, with a lot of bowling knowledge, and with an outswinger that would cause anyone problems. He showed patience, he built pressure, and the conditions helped him.This wasn’t the tearaway from the mountains, this was the professional first-class bowler, on top of his game, who had cut down on his pace after watching Jimmy Anderson’s success in English conditions. So this was someone bowling within himself as an intellectual move, not just a guy, at 32, slowing down with age.Sohail removed Alex Hales with a perfect new-ball outswinger. It couldn’t have been more romantic if the ball actually kissed the outside edge. The ball to Root was almost as good, even if Root was partly to blame for the wicket himself. Sohail wasn’t screaming like a loon who couldn’t believe his luck, he was celebrating like a well-worn professional who had taken wickets like this in the shadows for years, and had now got a chance to do it in a Test match. He pulled much the same trick for Vince’s outside edge.It was for Bairstow’s wicket, after extracting a bit of bounce out of the surface, that he showboated a bit and gave a comical head bob to show he was in control. Misbah had won the toss and bowled, Rahat Ali had one wicket, Sohail four at that point. He was in control. Amir had no wickets.***And yet, there he was at the top of his mark, looking confused. This strapping man, looking more like a Lollywood action hero than a Pakistani fast bowler. His run-up starts somewhere here, but instead of charging in, he looks down trying to remember where it should be.You can usually tell the difference between a bowler who is completely in control of his game, and one who is going to have a lot of good and bad days. It is in their run-up. And Sohail’s run-up seems to start from a different place almost every ball.But this isn’t some special trick of shortening his run-up for effect. He can start from four different places in one over. At one stage he has three markers, and he seems to ignore all three of them. Another time he moves his marker to a random area, as if it was getting in his head. And regularly, no matter where he started to run in from, he would lose his run-up as he approached the crease.But even when he got it wrong, he somehow, against cricket logic, still got it right at the crease. It may not be perfect, or always correct, but he is a bowler, and you don’t need to see his massive shoulders or huge frame to know that. He may forget his lines, but he knows bowling.***Sohail Khan’s dismissal of Alex Hales was his first wicket for five years•AFPTop-class athletes don’t often come back from long lay-offs and perform at the same level they were at before. Often they struggle, and disappear, like Ian Thorpe, Australia’s Thorpedo. Several female tennis players have managed it, as well as a few athletes, such as Justin Gatlin and Lance Armstrong, who may have had outside assistance. Many an old boxer, most notably George Foreman, have been lured back for some lesser glory. But it is hard enough to make it when you have spent your whole life working for it, it is harder still when you have missed out on a whole tranche of your development.Occasionally there are people like Dennis Lillee, who broke his back in 1973 but rebuilt his body and mind to become the ultimate bowler. But mostly when players lose a part of their 20s, they don’t come back the same. Michael Vick, the NFL quarterback, and Mike Tyson both lost parts of their careers to prison, and returned as different beasts. So too did Muhammad Ali, despite winning two further belts after returning from his political exile. Michael Jordan was never the same scoring machine after he left for baseball.Mohammad Amir had all the hype, the limited-overs spells, the viral wickets against Somerset, the many dropped chances off Cook, and the winning wicket at Lord’s. But right now, he isn’t the same bowler that he was aged 19, on the 2010 tour of England. Maybe he won’t ever be. Or maybe he will be next week.But if he can’t be, we shouldn’t be surprised. Five years out of the game, five years of not learning, of not conditioning his body, of not perfecting his action, of not getting through the tough days, of not developing his game, seem to have left with him the odd good ball, the odd great ball, and several other parts of game in which he is under-developed.Sohail’s five years out of Test cricket, on the other hand, have been spent perfecting his game. Doing all the things that Amir robbed himself of.***Sohail’s penultimate spell involved a quest for reverse swing. And the ball did swing for him. At times he used it well, but he also looked like he was riding an imaginary horse into the crease, and even the horse was tired. It didn’t look like he had another spell in him. But Misbah-ul-Haq brought him back to finish the day with the new ball.With every passing delivery, he looked more and more like a man longing for his hotel bed over a five-wicket haul. His pace was dropping so steadily, the speed gun attendant may have thought the batteries were slowly going flat in his machine.By the start of the last over of the day, Sohail wasn’t so much limping to the crease, more running as if there was an invisible man holding him back. The ball was swinging massively out of his hand, but if you are bowling at 68 miles per hour, sometimes the ball swings through boredom. Many great Pakistani fast bowlers might have seen his speed as an affront to their trade.Part of Sohail’s lack of pace was down to his efforts to get the ball to swing, but equally he could barely run in any more. Sohail was tired. It was only Steven Finn slapping him down the ground for four that woke him up. And suddenly he was back in the mid-80s, trying to knock his head off. He didn’t, because he still wasn’t that quick, and instead Finn hooked him away for another four.And yet, the pace might have gone, but the skills were still there.He delivered the perfect inswinger to James Anderson. It looked plumb on first impact, and Sohail appealed like it was. When it was given out, he fell to his knees. He ended up in a sajda, but his gesture was that of an exhausted man falling to the ground, having bowled through his spent body to take a five-wicket haul in a Test match.The only energy he could muster wasn’t for the wicket celebration, it was for the now-regulation Pakistani celebratory push-ups as he walked off. But his woodchopper’s shoulders still had enough latent power to perform a clap between each repetition.Amir cashed in with a couple of wickets at the end of the day. But for once it wasn’t about him. It was Sohail Khan’s day. No matter what Sohail does, he will never be the leading man, the star, the human headline. But all those years in the cricket wilderness, working at the academy, throwing rocks in the Hindu Kush, learning an outswinger, meant that he was ready.For Sohail, those five years might have felt like forever, but he used his exile well.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus